Before and after: four real decks through wetria

These are four real runs, each a single pass with no manual touch-ups. Three are client decks, so names, figures and logos were changed with wetria's own Sanitize before the images were made, the same way on both sides. The layouts are exactly what came back.

1. An executive review, every chart from the Excel

The draft was ten slides of text that named the data but did not show it. The brief was one line: "Executive committee deck, dark style. Build every chart from the attached Excel." Design mode, 87 tokens. Each chart was built from the spreadsheet and stays a live chart in PowerPoint and Keynote.

This is a test brief with its spreadsheet, not a client's deck; the run is real. The full walk-through is in every chart from the Excel.

2. An investor pitch, figures into one slide

A startup's twelve-slide pitch in Design mode, 73 tokens. On the financial model slide the draft was a list of figures under a heading. The point went into the title and three years of revenue into a chart. Every figure is the draft's.

3. A fund's sector deck, a crowded slide calmed

Eight slides on an agency's template, Design mode, 147 tokens. The slide below carried eleven points with a row of small pictures. The same eleven points now sit on one grid, in the deck's own colours. The layout changed; the content did not.

4. A vendor proposal, moved onto a template

Sixteen slides moved onto an agency's template with Adapt to template, 146 tokens. Every word and figure was carried across into the template's layouts, type and colours. Nothing was rewritten.

What the four have in common

• The words were already there. None of these decks needed a new argument.
• Each brief was one or two lines. The service carried the rest.
• Each pass cost between 73 and 147 tokens, the check included.
• Every slide was checked against the original before the result was shown.

What a single pass does not do

It does not decide what the deck should argue. If slide eight is the wrong slide, a cleaner version of it is still the wrong slide. That judgement is what the studio sells; read what changes in a presentation redesign for where layout ends and structure begins.